who is challenging the cross, said that 'it’s probably true that they were all Christians.'
But he added that the looming cross, especially when
illuminated at night, sends a message about religious favoritism rather than remembrance.
'When you’re driving at night, you don’t
see devotion and valor and all that stuff; you just see a giant cross floating in the darkness,” he said. “And
that leaves the impression that the city of Bladensburg is a Christian enclave. Now I grant that people who grow up in a
Christian environment often don’t think things like that,” he said. “Their Christian privilege
makes it to where they can’t easily see how it looks. But for people like me — and Jews and Hindus and Muslims
and Buddhists — this tells them they’re outsiders.'"
What crap! Hindus, Muslims (who revere Jesus as a holy prophet) and Buddhists
couldn't care a rat's ass about crosses on public property. Only militant atheists, Satanists, Jews and vampires
(but I repeat myself), get all worked up over the sight of a crucifix.
2. Maryland's historic post-war "Peace Cross" -- erected in 1925 -- has suddenly been deemed "offensive"
by "the usual suspects" and their "humanist" frontmen. // 3. Expect "Weekend at Ruthie's" Ginsberg
(cough cough) and the other three Supreme Court Jews (Sonia Sotomayor is a crypto "Marrano") to side with the God-hating
plaintiffs. Let's hope all five of the "conservative" judges will rule with some sanity in the upcoming case.
The manipulative kosherized bullshit about "separation of church and state" ™ -- which subversive groups such as the
ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) have used to cleanse the land of all vestiges
of Christianity and its positive moral effects -- is based on a single out-of-context quote by the brilliant author of the
Declaration of Independence and 3rd President of the United States at the time, Thomas Jefferson. As usual, the Marxist-Libtard Axis of Criminal
Insanity gets it all ass-backwards. Jefferson, a Deist, was not out to protect the government from Christianity. To the exact
contrary, he strove to protect religious practice from government control / interference.
Let's have a look at the full Jefferson letter (an 1802
response written to a group of Christians) in which he reassures them of his protection of their liberties.
affectionate sentiments of esteem and approbation which you are so good as to express towards me, on behalf of the Danbury
Baptist association, give me the highest satisfaction. My duties dictate a faithful and zealous pursuit of the interests
of my constituents, & in proportion as they are persuaded of my fidelity to those duties, the discharge of them becomes
more and more pleasing.
Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely
between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of
government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American
people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion,
or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between Church &
State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I
shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights,
convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties.
reciprocate your kind prayers for the protection & blessing of the common father and creator of man, and tender
you for yourselves & your religious association, assurances of my high respect & esteem. (emphasis added)
Jan. 1. 1802"
In other words, the government will not
establish / impose a state religion -- like the Church of England or the Russian Orthodox Church, for example -- on other
sects. That's all that phrase means -- nothing more!
Not only is
the term "separation of church and state" nowhere to be found in either the Declaration of Independence or the U.S.
Constitution; but the very letter in which the term appears shows that Jefferson's words have been taken out-of-context by
ACLU Communists in order to promote the religion of Atheism.
it is interesting to note how the religious symbols of a certain group (cough cough) can still find their way
onto public property without so much as a peep of complaint from the Communist / Atheist / ACLU Jew lawyer crowd. The National Menorah is a 40-foot tall & 30 foot wide monstrosity erected
on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, D.C. It was first lit in 1979 by President Jimmy Carter,
and has been erected and lit every year since -- growing taller in the process! The
annual event includes a music presentation of Hanukkah songs by the U.S. taxpayer-funded United States Army Band. Every year,
a Jewish government official or member of the president's cabinet participates in the lighting of Mega Menorah -- a symbol
of defiance against western (Greek) assimilation. U.S. governors now issue proclamations in honor of the National
Menorah; and now we also have annual Hanukkah and Passover Seder events inside the White House!
The Jews -- ever the grand masters of rhetorical gymnastics
-- argue that these stunts are no different than the annual outdoor lighting of the White House Christmas tree, or the annual
Easter Egg hunt. Now if we accept, for the sake of argument, the "separation of church and state" ™ nonsense, the flaw in such illogic is that decorated trees and painted eggs do not
carry any Christian / religious meaning or value; whereas the lighting of the menorah and the Passover Seder speech are, even
for atheistic Jews, important religious practices.
The "miraculous" menorah is their "crucifix" -- and the Passover blessing
and "miracle" speech is their "Our Father." So, a more accurate comparison would be to the erection of
a 40-foot cross on the White House grounds and a presidential recitation of the Lord's Prayer at the annual easter Egg Hunt. Man oh man and "oy vey!" Can "youse guys" even begin to imagine the
deafening magnitude of the "public" shit-storm such acts would kick up?
No sir. What's good for the goose is most certainly not permitted
for the Goyim gander. Why not? Because (((they))) OWN this frickin' country. That's why!
of synagogue and State? Not a chance!