We have all heard of the "Super Rats" - those
"miracles of Evolution TM" that have "mutated" into indestructible
creatures immune to even the deadliest of rat poisons. With breathless enthusiasm the disciples of Darwin hail these creatures
as smoking-gun evidence of "evolution on steroids". How pathetic that the 'Super Rats' phenomenon is the best "evidence"
the Evolutionists can muster in support of Darwin's simple first-cell-to amoeba-to-fish-to-amphibian-to-ape-to-man
delusion. Here is a typical example, from the London Telegraph, of the type of twisted tommy-rot that passes for "science",
and "journalism" these days:
New 'Super Rats' Evolve Resistance to Poison
Rats across Britain are evolving
a resistance to poison that makes them almost impossible to kill, scientists have warned.
"Genetic mutations have produced a new breed of "super rat" with DNA
that protects the vermin from standard toxins, according to Professor Robert Smith at the University of Huddersfield."
And this from PBS (Propaganda - Bullshit -Sophistry):
"The chemical arsenal we have developed in an attempt to rid our homes of
rodents and our crops of insects is losing its power. We have simply caused pest populations to evolve,
unintentionally applying artificial selection in the form of pesticides. Individuals with a higher
tolerance for our poisons survive and breed, and soon resistant individuals outnumber the ones we can control."
"Shhhh! Please don't rat me out as a fraud!"
And on and
on the fallacy of "evolution" goes; promoted by the press, taught in the schools, enforced by the state, never questioned
and never challenged. The most frustrating feature of this big misconception is that is so simple to debunk. All
it takes is a bit of thought and some common sense, yet the lie rolls on and on.
Now you might say, "Wait a minute Mike. The Super Rat phenomenon is very
real. The rats without immunity die. Those rats lucky enough to have the immunity survive, and the offspring
of those survivors inherit the immunity. What's so hard to understand about that?"
Well, there is nothing hard to understand about that; and nobody disputes the
existence of Super Rats. But the phenomenon only demonstrates natural selection (or, in this case, artificially-induced
natural selection) --- not "evolution" TM. But the rat remains
a rat! Nothing changed. Nothing "evolved TM". Nothing "mutated".
Not a single additional line of complex genetic code was added to the overall rat gene pool that wasn't already there to begin
with. The surviving rats were already genetically immune to the poison. The dead ones were not. What type of insane "scientist"
would make the galactic leap-of-faith from this common-sense example of natural selection, all the way to the 'simple first cell - to amoeba - to fish
- to amphibian - to ape - to man' scenario?
bottom line remains: trans-species evolution TM- let alone trans-genus, trans-family, trans-order,
trans-class, trans-phylum, trans-kingdom - has never been observed; neither in the fossil record,
nor in the current natural world. Indeed, by definition, trans-species Evolution - TM
is not observable. "We can't observe trans-species Evolution because the changes are so subtle and they accrue over
100's of millions of years - but trust it, it happened."
That's not science. That's wild conjecture. Darwin himself even admitted that the fossil record does not support
his theory. And anyone who tries to use the 'Super Rats' as a means to circumvent this Darwinian difficulty of non-observability
is either a criminal, an insane person, or just someone who hasn't really given the matter much thought.
Evolutionists have yet to observe / prove a single case of trans-species Evolution TM, yet, on the basis of 'Super-Rats',
we are expected to jump all the way up the biological classification ladder to trans-Kingdom Evolution TM -
which holds that both the lovely woman above and the inanimate rose that she is smelling have the same great grandmother [x].
"Fish become ape? Darwin stupid!"
better dispel the Super Rat Fallacy, for the sake of those who still don't see through the scam, let make an analogy to biological
weapons. The technology for engineering race-specific biological weapons does indeed exist. Let us all hope and pray that
the weapons themselves do not exist in some secret laboratory! But suppose that some evil clandestine group were to poison
the reservoirs and springs of Japan with a biological weapon that was lethal to people with a certain gene specific to Asiatics.
(that's the analogy to the rat poison).
would happen? Obviously, the Asiatic inhabitants of Japan would die after drinking the poisoned water. But what about the
tiny minority of White expatriates, tourists, teachers, missionaries et al, present in Japan at the time of the great poisoning?
The biological weapon wouldn't kill them. The "Whites of Japan" would survive, unchanged, and pass on their
genetic immunity to the bio-weapon on to their offspring. (the analogy to the Super-Rat). One hundred years later,
Japan could be a thriving island nation of 10 million White people, all speaking English too!
Now, what type of deranged crackpot mad-scientist would then dare to hypothesize, no,
declare, that the Asiatics of Japan "mutated" into White people? See my point? And yet, this is exactly
the type of madness that the great and the good of Academia are shoving down our throats as they denounce doubters as "uneducated"
and "anti-science". Dirty rats!
In the bio-weapon analogy to 'Super Rats',
the predominately Asiatic group on the left "mutates" into the totally White group on the right only because a dash
of certain "White genes" are already present among a few of the population (such as the teacher standing on left).
That is NOT 'Evolution' TM.
Don't fall for Evolutionist Tricks!
READ: GOD VS DARWIN
(fka The God of Logic)